Giant Impact Hypothesis

Earth C_ _ _ _ _?

Planetoid impact of Earth to form the Moon.

At Last, Corresponding evidence to support a theory - 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-37177575?SThisFB

The formation of the moon:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4265886/Ancient-Earth-surrounded-solid-shell.html

The Giant Impact Hypothesis -

If the GIH is correct then the emergence of one main protruding land mass would now be a probable resultant consequence of an impact with the body of Theia.

Early and Late Bombardment

Theia is not likely to be the firstor only large impact/joining during the accretion of Earth.

The formed Moon

'An 'exponential' rise of land out of the ocean 2.4 billion years ago dramatically changed life on the planet. This graphic shows how Earth's land elevations and oceans may have appeared during the assembly of Kenorland around 2.4 billion years ago, left, and around 2.1 billion years ago, right, after the Great Oxygenation Event.'

After [as] the Moon formed from the orbiting ejecta over flow caused by the impact of Thea, the new gravity body [The Moon] initiated tidal forces, Earth core heating, the [increase] of Earth's magetic field and initiated the movement of the plates.

'Scientists reveal how continents first emerged out of the ancient waterworld'

'Land collisions which rose out of the oceans created the first mountain ranges and plateaus'.

This idea must have been before they invented Isaac Newton.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5758541/Scientists-reveal-continents-emerged-ancient-waterworld.html#ixzz5GPh6EcqH

Giant Impact Hypothesis Mass Displacement Theory

If we therefore come to the plausible conclusion that after the earth formed from a fragment of nebulous material via the circling process known as accretion, then the proto-earth was impacted by a second planet that partly combined and broke off a mass that became an orbiting mass and or fragments that then further combined to form our moon, then is it not reasonable to add an unmentioned by product from the impact force, of a mass desplacement [bulge] opposite to the side of impact?

The moon carried on to be shaped by our interacting gravities [with the moon's iron mass [gravitational bulge] on the earth side – ‘Clementine’] and created the earth’s [larger body] magnetic field. Also the added earth heat caused by the gravitational torsion between the earth and the formed moon created the tectonic plate movements that we have observed over geological time.   

Would it therefore also be reasonable the conclude that left unaltered by a new force that the end process of the tectonic movements under the law of gravity will be that the destiny of the [bulge] segments will be to level-out flattest possible [with continued and reducig tectonic plate recoil] mostly back under [pic 1] the water.

Reducing the tidal strain to end seismic releases and tectonic recoil re-submergence.

C_ _ _ _?

Something for the Future

See 7.

http://www.zorabian.co.uk/cars/70-billion/